Transportation Master Plan - Last Mile: Difference between revisions
From Modelado Foundation
imported>Wpinfold No edit summary |
imported>Wpinfold No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:139.49pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Ladder of opportunity: help disabled/in need to meet needs</p> | | style="text-align:left;width:139.49pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Ladder of opportunity: help disabled/in need to meet needs</p> | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:122pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Mobility for users in need (AARP example)</p> | | style="text-align:left;width:122pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Mobility for users in need (AARP example)</p> | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:180.99pt; " class="ce12" | <p>Traditional ride share</p> | | style="text-align:left;width:180.99pt; " class="ce12" | <p>[http://actweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Ridesharing-Definition-Release_091714v2.pdf Traditional ride share]</p> | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:158pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Tiers of Funders: <br />- [https://www.transportation.gov/smartcity US DOT], [https://www.nsf.gov/cise/scc/ NSF]<br />- [http://www.apta.com/about/generalinfo/Pages/default.aspx Transit operators]</p> | | style="text-align:left;width:158pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Tiers of Funders: <br />- [https://www.transportation.gov/smartcity US DOT], [https://www.nsf.gov/cise/scc/ NSF]<br />- [http://www.apta.com/about/generalinfo/Pages/default.aspx Transit operators]</p> | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:148pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Coming together doesn’t stop existing actions in lone transportation clusters</p> | | style="text-align:left;width:148pt; " class="ce6" | <p>Coming together doesn’t stop existing actions in lone transportation clusters</p> | ||
Revision as of 23:25, January 22, 2017
Blueprint |
Implementation | |||||
High Level Purpose |
Goals/Objectives |
Strategies/Approach |
Contributors Board |
Collaboration Plan |
Targets/Metrics |
Timing/Milestones |
Improved/ affordable access to transporation points |
Understand effective radius of low-velocity vehicle based on local environment |
3D-printing for speed of solution (rapid customization) - can also aid in job development |
Cities: Baltimore, Chattanooga, Columbus, Florence, Greeneville, Milan, Portland, Washington DC |
Share emerging best solutions with other cities |
Increase in public transportation use |
Meetings: |
Ladder of opportunity: help disabled/in need to meet needs |
Mobility for users in need (AARP example) |
Tiers of Funders: |
Coming together doesn’t stop existing actions in lone transportation clusters |
Reduction in congestion (need to determine best measurement method) |
GCTC- Document report of Urban Mobility Blueprint by March | |
Pollution reduction |
Achieve Equity |
Incentivize development community |
Local policy makers (mayor) |
Identify city resources - how? |
Long term: It's a paradigm shift | |
Transportation= advanced mobility, wellness, livability |
What incentive programs work? Policies? Subsidies? |
Incentive: Citizen Fitbit that incentives green actions/ green trips (but consider app fatigue) |
Universities |
Send email with invite to Google group |
||
Data interoperability standards |
Standard communication protocol (vanilla platform) |
Metro planning organizations |
Identifify sub-work groups and have virtual report outs following sub-group meetings |
|||
Identify data needs/ sources |
How do we avoid conflicts of interest? |
Manufacturers: Ford/ Local Motors |
Share reports/data in Google group |
|||
Smart movement of goods (hub & spoke approach) |
Identify method to use same vehicle for movement of goods (existing carriers) |
FRA |
||||
Economic modeling- how do we gain buy-in from the community? |
Smart city IT- how does it help? |
Procurement entities |
||||
Service/Civic Engagement Organizations |
||||||