Reproducible Computational Science: Difference between revisions
From Modelado Foundation
imported>Maherou (→Tools) |
imported>Wpinfold No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*[https://occam.cs.pitt.edu/ Occam] | *[https://occam.cs.pitt.edu/ Occam] | ||
*[https://github.com/systemslab/popper Popper Project] | *[https://github.com/systemslab/popper Popper Project] | ||
*[http://www.taverna.org.uk Taverna Workflow Management System] | |||
*[http://www.myexperiment.org myExperiment] with a good example of use [http://f1000research.com/articles/3-110/v1 here] | |||
*[http://onlinehpc.com OnlineHPC] | |||
*[https://kepler-project.org Kepler Project] | |||
*[http://vistrails.org VisTrails] | |||
*[http://www.reproducibility.org Madagascar] | |||
=Speakers= | =Speakers= | ||
Revision as of 02:12, March 8, 2017
Computational science has enable significant breakthroughs in science and engineering but, a number of factors make this work dificulty to reproduce. Reproducibility is a foundation of the scientific method so we must to redouble our efforts to make this work easy to reproduce.
Tools
- Project Jupyter
- binder
- Occam
- Popper Project
- Taverna Workflow Management System
- myExperiment with a good example of use here
- OnlineHPC
- Kepler Project
- VisTrails
- Madagascar
Speakers
- Bruce Childers
- Todd Harris
- Jeremy Freeman
- Ward Cummingham
- Bernard Rous