Transportation Master Plan - Last Mile: Difference between revisions
From Modelado Foundation
imported>Wpinfold No edit summary |
imported>Wpinfold No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| border=" | {| border="1" cellspacing=0 class="ta1"<colgroup><col width="26"/><col width="215"/><col width="188"/><col width="279"/><col width="244"/><col width="228"/><col width="195"/><col width="181"/><col width="75"/></colgroup> | ||
|- class="ro3" | |- class="ro3" | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:17.01pt; " class="Default" | | | style="text-align:left; width:17.01pt; " class="Default" | | ||
| colspan="4" style="text-align:center;width:139.49pt; " class="ce3" | <p>Blueprint</p> | | colspan="4" style="text-align:center;width:139.49pt; " class="ce3" | <p>Blueprint</p> | ||
| colspan="3" style="text-align:center;width:148pt; " class="ce3" | <p>Implementation</p> | | colspan="3" style="text-align:center;width:148pt; " class="ce3" | <p>Implementation</p> | ||
| Line 117: | Line 104: | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:126.51pt; " class="ce8" | | | style="text-align:left;width:126.51pt; " class="ce8" | | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:117.5pt; " class="ce14" | | | style="text-align:left;width:117.5pt; " class="ce14" | | ||
| style="text-align:left;width:48.5pt; " class="Default" | | | style="text-align:left;width:48.5pt; " class="Default" | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 07:27, January 22, 2017
Blueprint |
Implementation |
|||||||
High Level Purpose |
Goals/Objectives |
Strategies/Approach |
Contributors Board |
Collaboration Plan |
Targets/Metrics |
Timing/Milestones |
||
Improved/ affordable access to transporation points |
Understand effective radius of low-velocity vehicle based on local environment |
3D-printing for speed of solution (rapid customization) - can also aid in job development |
Cities: Columbus, Baltimore, Chattanooga, Greeneville, DC, Milan, Florence |
Share emerging best solutions with other cities |
Increase in public transportation use |
Meetings: February in Portland; another meeting in June |
||
Ladder of opportunity: help disabled/in need to meet needs |
Mobility for users in need (AARP example) |
Traditional ride share |
Tiers of Funders: -DOT, NSF -Transit operators |
Coming together doesn’t stop existing actions in lone transportation clusters |
Reduction in congestion (need to determine best measurement method) |
GCTC- Document report of blueprint by March |
||
Pollution reduction |
Achieve Equity |
Incentivize development community |
Local policy makers (mayor) |
Identify city resources - how? |
Long term: It's a paradigm shift |
|||
Transportation= advanced mobility, wellness, livability |
What incentive programs work? Policies? Subsidies? |
Incentive: Citizen Fitbit that incentives green actions/ green trips (but consider app fatigue) |
Universities |
Send email with invite to Google group |
||||
Data interoperability standards |
Standard communication protocol (vanilla platform) |
Metro planning organizations |
Identifify sub-work groups and have virtual report outs following sub-group meetings |
|||||
Identify data needs/ sources |
How do we avoid conflicts of interest? |
Manufacturers: Ford/ Local Motors |
Share reports/data in Google group |
|||||
Smart movement of goods (hub & spoke approach) |
Identify method to use same vehicle for movement of goods (existing carriers) |
FRA |
||||||
Economic modeling- how do we gain buy-in from the community? |
Smart city IT- how does it help? |
Procurement entities |
||||||
Service/Civic Engagement Organizations |
||||||||