Actions

Operating Systems: Difference between revisions

From Modelado Foundation

imported>Beckman
No edit summary
imported>Beckman
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
| '''PI''' || Ron Brightwell || Shekhar Borkar || Katherine Yelick || Daniel Quinlan  || Guang Gao || Mary Hall || Andrew Chien || Koushik Sen || Milind Kulkarni || Martin Schulz
| '''PI''' || Ron Brightwell || Shekhar Borkar || Katherine Yelick || Daniel Quinlan  || Guang Gao || Mary Hall || Andrew Chien || Koushik Sen || Milind Kulkarni || Martin Schulz
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|What are the key system calls / features that you need OS/R to support?  Examples: fork(), sockets?,  
|What are the key system calls / features that you need OS/R to support?  Examples: exit, read, write, open, close, link, unlink, chdir, time, chmod, clone, uname, execv, etc.
|(EXPRESS)
|(EXPRESS)
|(TG)
|(TG)

Revision as of 16:15, April 29, 2014

Sonia requested that Pete Beckman initiate this page. For comments, please contact Pete Beckman. This page is still in development.

QUESTIONS XPRESS TG X-Stack DEGAS D-TEC DynAX X-TUNE GVR CORVETTE SLEEC PIPER
PI Ron Brightwell Shekhar Borkar Katherine Yelick Daniel Quinlan Guang Gao Mary Hall Andrew Chien Koushik Sen Milind Kulkarni Martin Schulz
What are the key system calls / features that you need OS/R to support? Examples: exit, read, write, open, close, link, unlink, chdir, time, chmod, clone, uname, execv, etc. (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) SLEEC (PIPER)
'Program analysis can be both challenging and require specialized expertise. What requirements do you have for program analysis and what level of expertise you expect to require? This problem could be posed in terms of what APIs for program analysis results do you expect? (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)
What types of hardware do you expect to address/target within optimizations and at what level of granularity of the program (e.g. coarse-grain, over multiple functions, or fine-grain within statements)? (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)
What general purpose languages do you expect to use and or extend to support your research work?" (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)
Do you expect to use, require, or develop an Embedded DSL (defined by compiler support that would leverage semantics of abstractions defined completely within a general purpose base language) or an Extended DSL (define by compiler support that would leverage semantics of abstractions defined by new syntax)?" (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)