Actions

Compilers

From Modelado Foundation

Revision as of 15:43, April 28, 2014 by imported>Dquinlan (Minor edits, typo fixes, and a new question)

Sonia requested that Dan Quinlan initiate this page. For comments, please contact Dan Quinlan. This page is still in development.

QUESTIONS XPRESS TG X-Stack DEGAS D-TEC DynAX X-TUNE GVR CORVETTE SLEEC PIPER
PI Ron Brightwell Shekhar Borkar Katherine Yelick Daniel Quinlan Guang Gao Mary Hall Andrew Chien Koushik Sen Milind Kulkarni Martin Schulz
Describe how you expect to require compiler support within your X-Stack project. (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) SLEEC (PIPER)
'Program analysis can be both challenging and require specialized expertise. What requirements do you have for program analysis and what level of expertise you expect to require? This problem could be posed in terms of what APIs for program analysis results do you expect? (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)
What types of hardware do you expect to address/target within optimizations and at what level of granularity of the program (e.g. coarse-grain, over multiple functions, or fine-grain within statements)? (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)
What general purpose languages do you expect to use and or extend to support your research work?" (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)
Do you expect to use, require, or develop an Embedded DSL (defined by compiler support that would leverage semantics of abstractions defined completely within a general purpose base language) or an Extended DSL (define by compiler support that would leverage semantics of abstractions defined by new syntax)?" (EXPRESS) (TG) (DEGAS) (D-TEC) (DynAX) (X-TUNE) (GVR) (CORVETTE) N/A (PIPER)