Actions

GVR

From Modelado Foundation

GVR: Exploiting Global-view for Resilience
GVR-Logos.png
Team Members U. of Chicago, ANL, HP Labs
PI Andrew Chien
Co-PIs Pavan Balaji (ANL)
Website http://gvr.cs.uchicago.edu/
Download https://sites.google.com/site/uchicagolssg/lssg/research/gvr/downloads

Exploiting Global View for Resilience or GVR

Team Members


Application Partnerships

  • Advanced Nuclear Reactor Simulation (Andrew Siegel, CESAR)
  • Computational Chemistry (Jeff Hammond, ALCF)
  • Rich Computational Frameworks (Trilinos, Mike Heroux, Sandia)
  • Particle codes (ddcMD) (David Richards, Ignacio Laguna, LLNL)
  • Adaptive Mesh Refinement (Chombo) (Brian van Straalen, Anshu Dubey, LBNL)
  • Combustion (S3D) (Jackie Chen, Sandia)


Global View Resilience (GVR) is a new programming approach that exploits a global view data model (global naming of data, consistency, and distributed layout), adding reliability to globally visible distributed arrays. The globally-visible distributed array abstraction is "multi-version", providing redundancy in time, and a convenient location for application annotations for reliability needs. Because the distributed array abstraction is portable, GVR enables application programmers to manage reliability (and its overhead) in a flexible, portable fashion, tapping their deep scientific and application code insights. Further, GVR will provide a flexible, efficient, cross-layer error management architecture called “open reliability” that allows applications to describe error detection (checking) and recovery routines and inject them into the GVR stack for efficient implementation. This architecture enables applications and systems to work in concert, exploiting semantics (algorithmic or even scientific domain) and key capabilities (e.g., fast error detection in hardware) to dramatically increase the range of errors that can be detected and corrected.

Resilience Challenges

  • Can we achieve a smooth transition to system resilience? (a la Flash memory, Internet)
  • What’s an application to do?

GVR-Resilience-Challenges.png


Resilience Co-design

Co‑design without co‑dependence

  • Software: Information and Algorithms to enhance resilience (REQ: Portable, flexible)
  • Runtime, OS, and Architecture Mechanisms to enhance resilience (REQ: leverage beyond HPC, cheap)


GVR-Resilience-Co-design.png

Project Impact

Challenges

  • Enable an application to incorporate resilience incrementally, expressing resilience proportionally to the application need
  • “Outside in”, as needed, incremental, ...


GVR Approach 1

GVR-Approach-1.png


  • Application-System Partnership
    • Expose and exploit algorithm and application domain knowledge
    • Enable “End to end” resilience model
  • Foundation in Data-oriented resilience
    • Internet services, map-reduce, internet, ...
    • Achieve with high performance and massive parallelism...
    • Global view data Foundation (PGAS..., GA, SWARM, ParalleX, CnC, ...)

Data-oriented Resilience

GVR-Data-Oriented.png


  • Parallel applications and global-view data
  • Natural parallel structure version-to-version
    • Example: shock hydro simulation at t=10ms to 100ms
    • Example: iterative solver at iteration 1 to 20
    • Example: monte carlo at 10M to 20M points
  • Temporal redundancy enables rollback and resume
    • User-controlled, convenient

Resilience Partnership

  • Proportional Resilience
    • Application specifies “Resilience priorities”
    • Mapped into data-redundancy in space
    • Mapped into redundancy in time (multi-version)
    • Complements computation/task redundancy efforts
  • Deep error detection: invariants, assertions, checks ... and recovery
  • Applications add further checks based on algorithm and domain semantics
    • Application add flexible, adaptive recovery mechanisms (and exploit multi-version)
  • “End-to-end” resilience


GVR Approach 2

GVR-Approach-2.png


  • x-layer approach for efficient execution (and better resilience)
    • Spatial redundancy – coding at multiple levels, system level checking
    • Temporal redundancy - Multi-version memory, integrated memory and NVRAM management
  • Push checks to most efficient level (find early, contain, reduce overhead)
  • Recover based on semantics from any level (repair more, larger feasible computation, reduce overhead)
  • Efficient implementation support in runtime, OS, architecture ... increase efficiency and containment

Multi-version Memory

GVR-Memory.png


  • Common parallel paradigm, basis for programmer engagement
  • Frames invariant checks, more complex checks based on high-level semantics
  • Frames sophisticated recovery


Research Challenges

  • Understand application resilience needs and opportunities for proportional resilience and deep error detection/end-to-end resilience
  • Explore multi-version memory as opportunity for framing richer resilience and parallelism
  • Design API that embodies these ideas and gentle slope incremental application effort
  • Create efficient x-layer implementations - many questions
  • Explore architecture opportunities to increase resilience and reduce overhead


Global‑view Data Program

GVR-Program-1.png


GVR Resilience Program

GVR-Program-2.png


Global View & Consistent Snapshots

GVR-Snapshots.png


  • How to safely, efficiently identify consistent snapshots?
    • Application control: Global Synch; Array-level synch; explicit snapshot
    • Application flagged (optional)
    • Implicit (runtime decides)
  • Snapshots = natural points to express and implement assertions, checks, recovery


Implementing Multi-version

GVR-Implementing.png


  • How to implement multi-version efficiently?
    • Time, Space, Label => representation, protocol
  • Which to take?
    • Versions are logical, snapshots require resources
  • Intelligent storage:
    • Representation, compression, architecture support
    • Older versions recede into storage [SILT]


Intelligent Memory and Storage

GVR-Memory-Storage.png


  • How to exploit intelligence at memory and storage? (at controller)
  • Intelligent stacked DRAM and storage-class Memory [HMC,PIM]
  • Fine-grained state tracking; compression, intelligent, copying, etc.
  • Efficient version capture; differenced checkpoints (Plank95, Svard11)


Opportunities

  • Multi-version and increased concurrency
  • Multi-version and debugging
  • Architecture support and fine-grained synchronization, application checks, compressed memory, etc.
  • ...more?


Expected Outcomes

  • Use cases – Application skeleton design and classifications which form foundation of the design
  • Design of GVR API for flexible resilience and multi-version global data
  • Research prototype software developed as a library; target for programmers, compiler backends
  • Experiments with mini-apps and application partners (w/ co-design postdocs)
  • Assessment of architecture support opportunities and quantitative benefits


GVR X-Stack Synergies

GVR-Synergies.png


  • Direct Application Programming Interface
  • Co-existence, even target with other Runtimes
  • Rich Solver Library Building Block
  • Programming System Target


Research Products

Full report = Media:gvr-research-products.pdf

  • Demonstrated easy application integration, <2% lines of code change in large (10K-100K line applications)
  • Demonstrated controllable and low performance overhead (application scaling to 16,384 nodes and <2% overhead)
  • Released on multiple platforms, including Cray (Edison, Cori), IBM BG/Q (Mira, JuQueen), Linux clusters
  • Demonstrated flexible, portable application-semantics based forward-error correction in multiple applications (OpenMC, ddcMD, etc.)
  • Software release available from http://gvr.cs.uchicago.edu/ and deployed at multiple supercomputing centers, including NERSC.

Publications

(see project web site for full up to date list)

  • Hajime Fujita, Kamil Iskra, Pavan Balaji, and Andrew A. Chien, "Versioning Architectures for Local and Global Memory", in Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), December 2015, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Aiman Fang, Hajime Fujita and Andrew A. Chien, "Towards Understanding Post-Recovery Efficiency for Shrinking and Non-Shrinking Recovery", in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Resiliency in High Performance Computing (Resilience) in Clusters, Clouds, and Grids, at Euro-Par 2015, Vienna, Austria, August 24, 2015
  • Anshu Dubey, Hajime Fujita, Zachary Rubenstein, Brian Van Straalen and Andrew Chien. "A Case Study Of Application Structure Aware Resilience Through Differentiated State Saving And Recovery", in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Resiliency in High Performance Computing (Resilience) in Clusters, Clouds, and Grids, at Euro-Par 2015, Vienna, Austria, August 24, 2015
  • Hajime Fujita, Kamil Iskra, Pavan Balaji, and Andrew A. Chien, "Empirical Characterization of Versioning Architectures", in Proceedings of IEEE Cluster, September 8-10, 2015, Chicago.
  • A. Chien, P. Balaji, N. Dun, A. Fang, H. Fujita, K. Iskra, Z. Rubenstein, Z. Zheng, J. Hammond, I. Laguna, D. Richards, A. Dubey, B. van Straalen, M Hoemmen, M. Heroux, K. Teranishi, A. Siegel. Exploring Versioning for Resilience in Scientific Applications: Global-view Resilience, submitted for publication, March 2015. (Best overall project summary)
  • Aiman Fang and Andrew A. Chien, "How Much SSD Is Useful for Resilience in Supercomputers”, in ACM Symposium on Fault-tolerance at Extreme-Scale (FTXS) associated with HPDC 2015, Portland, Oregon, June 15, 2015 (Slides)
  • Aiman Fang, "How Much SSD Is Useful for Resilience in Supercomputers”, Master's Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, April 2015.
  • Nan Dun, Hajime Fujita, John R. Tramm, Andrew A. Chien, Andrew R. Siegel, Data Decomposition in Monte Carlo Neutron Transport Simulations using Global View Arrays, International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, March 2015.
  • A. Chien, P. Balaji, P. Beckman, N. Dun, A. Fang, H. Fujita, K. Iskra, Z. Rubenstein, Z. Zheng, R. Schreiber, J. Hammond, J. Dinan, A. Laguna, D. Richards, A. Dubey, B. van Straalen, M Hoemmen, M. Heroux, K. Teranishi, A. Siegel, and J. Tramm, "Versioned Distributed Arrays for Resilience in Scientific Applications: Global View Resilience", in International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS 2015), Reykjavik, Iceland, June 2015.
  • Hajime Fujita, Nan Dun, Zachary Rubenstein, and Andrew A. Chien. Log-Structured Global Array for Efficient Multi-Version Snapshots, IEEE CCGrid 2015, May 2015. Also UChicago CS Tech Report 2014-16, Nov 2014.
  • Hajime Fujita, Nan Dun, Aiman Fang, Zachary A. Rubenstein, Ziming Zheng, Kamil Iskra, Jeff Hammond, Anshu Dubey, Pavan Balaji, Andrew A. Chien: Using Global View Resilience (GVR) to add Resilience to Exascale Applications, SC14, Nov 2014 (Best Poster Finalist!)
  • The GVR Team, Global View Resilience (GVR) Documentation, Release 1.0, University of Chicago, Computer Science Technical Report 2014-10.
  • Nan Dun, Hajime Fujita, John Tramm, Andrew A. Chien, and Andrew R. Siegel. Data Decomposition in Monte Carlo Particle Transport Simulations using Global View Arrays, UChicago CS Tech Report 2014-09 May 2014.
  • The GVR Team, How Applications Use GVR: Use Cases, University of Chicago, Computer Science Technical Report 2014-06.
  • The GVR Team, Global View Resilience, API Documentation R0.8.1-rc0, University of Chicago, Computer Science Technical Report 2014-05.
  • Aiman Fang and Andrew A. Chien, "Applying GVR to Molecular Dynamics: Enabling Resilience for Scientific Computations", Tech Report, University of Chicago, Dept of Computer Science, CS-TR-2014-04, April 2014.
  • Ziming Zheng, Andrew A. Chien, Keita Teranishi, "Fault Tolerance in an Inner-Outer Solver: a GVR-enabled Case Study", in Proceedings of VECPAR 2014, July 2014, Eugene, Oregon. Proceedings available from Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  • Z. Rubenstein, "Error Checking and Snapshot-based Recovery in Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Solver", Masters Thesis, University of Chicago, Department of Computer Science, March 2014.
  • Z. Rubenstein, J. Dinan, H. Fujita, Z. Zheng, A. Chien, "Error Checking and Snapshot-Based Recovery in a Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Solver", University of Chicago, Department of Computer Science Technical Report 2013-11, December 2013
  • Wesley Bland, Aurelien Bouteiller, Thomas Herault, Joshua Hursey, George Bosilca, and JackJ. Dongarra. An evaluation of User-Level Failure Mitigation support in MPI. Computing, 95(12):1171–1184, 2013.
  • Ziming Zheng, Zachary Rubenstein, and Andrew A. Chien, GVR-Enabled Trilinos: An Outside-In Approach for Resilient Computing, in the SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing, February 2014, Portland Oregon.
  • Ziming Zheng, Andrew A. Chien, Mark Hoemmen, Keita Teranishi, "Fault Tolerance in an Inner-Outer Solver: a GVR-enabled Case Study", available as Technical Report from University of Chicago Department of Computer Science, CS-TR-2014-01, January 2014.
  • Guoming Lu, Ziming Zheng, and Andrew A. Chien, When are Multiple Checkpoints Needed?, in 3rd Workshop for Fault-tolerance at Extreme Scale (FTXS), at IEEE Conference on High Performance Distributed Computing, June 2013, New York, New York.
  • Hajime Fujita, Robert Schreiber, Andrew A. Chien, It's Time for New Programming Models for Unreliable Hardware, to appear in ASPLOS 2013 Provocative Ideas session, March 18, 2013.
  • Sean Hogan, Jeff Hammond, and Andrew A. Chien, An Evaluation of Difference and Threshold Techniques for Efficient Checkpointing, 2nd Workshop on Fault-Tolerance at Extreme Scale FTXS 2012 at DSN 2012, June 2012, Boston, Massachusetts.